Since, in accordance with Ohm’s law in Steinmetz’s interpretation, inductive and capacitive reactances the values of which are imaginary numbers, are measured by the devices available in each radio engineering laboratory, this unambiguously proves their physical reality. even Ohm’s law in Steinmetz’s interpretation would not exist.there could be no resonance in electric circuits, as well as no electric filters could exist and thus, there would be neither television, nor telecommunication, nor radiolocation, nor many other things without which modern life would be unthinkable.no shock oscillations such as tsunami, Indian summer, noise of bells, piano music could exist in nature, and even a kid’s swing couldn’t swing after being pushed by parents.In order not to repeat these proofs, we only note that it follows from them that if the principle of light speed non-exceedance were true, (Color online) Graphs of functions (1) and (2).Īfter all, physical reality of imaginary numbers has been proven and explained in publications. Consequently, formula (1) is incorrect and that is why it could not be explained.įigure 1. , in function (1) corresponded to real numbers, then its graph would still be inexplicable in this velocity range (see Figure 1a), since it corresponds to a physically unstable process that cannot exist in nature.
Indeed, everyone knows what 2 kg is, but, no one knows what 2 i kg is, whereĮven if the relativistic mass m at hyper-light speeds, when Admittedly, today no one can do it so far. As well as no one could explain physical meaning of imaginary numbers 400 years before them.
Antimatter cost how to#
However, the authors of the STR did not know how to explain such a result. M is the relativistic mass of a moving physical body Where m 0 is the rest mass of a moving physical body (e.g. For example, the relativistic mass m, apparently, takes imaginary values at hyper-light speeds, when That is because the relativistic formulas obtained in the generally accepted version of the STR couldn’t be explained by its creators.
Since the principle of light speed non-exceedance in the generally accepted version of the STR, set forth in all university and school textbooks of physics, has still been believed to be true, it will be necessary to explain why this is not so and why this principle, which is just a postulate, since it has never been proven by anyone, turned out to be in demand. Refutation of the Principle of Light Speed Non-Exceedance Therefore, this article further proposes a corrected version of the STR.Ģ. Otherwise, science would not have developed. And then, sooner or later, they are inevitably refuted by subsequent newer theories. Ultimately, all scientific theories are created as a result of identifying and correcting the errors of previously created theories. assumptions from which the principle of light speed non-exceedance turned out to be incorrect.īut that’s not a big deal. Due to the lack of experimental data required for its creation, that were obtained only in the 21st century, it was created using the postulates, i.e. And such a version of the STR was created by efforts of Joseph Larmor (1857-1942), Nobel laureate Hendrik Antoon Lorentz (1853-1928), Jules Henri Poincaré (1854-1912) and Nobel laureate Albert Einstein (1859-1955) in the 20th century. However, the STR had to be first created and then refuted. Moreover, in addition to its direct purpose of calculating electrical circuits, it also proved physical reality of imaginary numbers in the simplest and most convincing way, and thereby refuted generally accepted version of the special theory of relativity (STR). Now, it is daily used by millions of engineers in their practice. In 1897, Charles Proteus Steinmetz (1865-1923) proposed his interpretation of Ohm’s law in respect to linear AC circuits ref. The senior official believed that the use of mathematics in physics was unacceptable.
What a favorable theme were electrical phenomena for the most riotous imaginations … Attractive and vague deductions were in the foreground: hard work of experimenter and exact mathematical analysis were not honored they seemed superfluous and harmful in the study of nature …” And in 1828, Ohm was fired by personal order of Minister of Education for publishing his physics discoveries. Alexander Grigorievich Stoletov (1839-1896) wrote in this regard: “… physics especially tempted natural philosophers. In 1826, when Georg Simon Ohm (1789-1854) discovered the law named after him, the science of physics did not yet exist.
0 kommentar(er)
